Outlook: FTSE indices
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.TRICKY THINGS, these stock market indices. You might have thought that your Sky, Orange, Anglo American, Daily Mail and General Trust, Schroders and Colt Telecom shares were worth so much; turns out they are worth a lot less, or by the time FTSE International gets round to "reweighting" its indices - which admittedly won't be until June 2001 - they will be anyway.
Mind you, if you'd had that lot in your portfolio for the last couple of years, you'd already be laughing all the way to the bank, so no one is going to feel too sorry for you. One of the reasons these stocks have so dramatically outperformed is because the market in their shares is so limited.
At the same time, however, they've been afforded a weighting in the FTSE 100 which equates to their total market capitalisation. This in turn has meant that tracker funds and others ruled by the tyranny of the benchmarks have had to pay through the nose to achieve a corresponding weighting in their portfolios, and boy have they chased up those prices in doing so.
From June the year after next, so as to allow everyone time to absorb the changes, weightings will be decided according to how much of the stock is genuinely free to trade. This is obviously the right thing to do, but it's a bit like slamming the door after the horse has bolted. An awful lot of damage has already been done as a result of the investment distortion caused by the present system.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments