Outlook: Economic agenda
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE TWICE-YEARLY meetings of the G7 finance ministers and IMF are notorious for the snail's pace at which the policy agenda progresses. Third World debt relief, the issue that is top of Gordon Brown's list of priorities this weekend, has been rumbling along for most of this decade. Likewise, reform of the IMF has been on the agenda since 1994, when the Mexican crisis sorely exposed the organisation's limitations.
The next week could be different. The Chancellor regards it as a crucial meeting for his ambitious debt-relief package. Other G7 countries have already enjoyed the benefit of favourable headlines about the initiative, so the pressure on them to pay up has abated. Mr Brown has to make sure they do.
Similarly, a year on from the height of the global financial crisis, the time has come to look up from the blueprints and start the brickwork for the new international financial architecture. The new body bringing together the G7 and major developing countries, currently known as the G-X, must be brought into being. If the Chancellor gets his way the IMF's Interim Committee, which he now chairs, should also be put on a firmer footing with more say over the Fund's policies.
In addition, the complex issue of "bailing-in" the private sector in future crises must be urgently addressed. This will increase risk and perhaps curtail future investment, but observers of the 1997-98 crisis might argue that is no bad thing. These measures do not add up to radical reform, but they do make it likely that the shape of the international financial order will be different, and improved. At long last there is some prospect of real progress.
Outlook@independent.co.uk
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments