Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Outlook: Competitiveness

Wednesday 14 July 1999 00:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THERE IS something irresistible about league tables. Everyone loves peer group comparison. So it is with the annual competitiveness report from the World Economic Forum, which runs the annual Davos forum for the great and good in business. The same countries tend to cluster at the top and bottom year after year, but the UK is one of the those which moves up and down the international hit parade.

The report's first verdict on the Labour Government is not good. The measures which reintroduce red tape and higher costs into the jobs market made a big contribution to the four point slippage this year. So too did a long-standing weakness which is getting worse, namely the shortfall in scientific and technological capacity. This is a problem the government has so far failed to dent. At number eight out of 59, however, the UK is still ranked one of the most competitive economies in the world, and certainly one of the few big economies in the top quarter of the table. Continental European countries lag behind because of their greater jobs, goods and capital market rigidities, and because their public sectors take a bigger bite out of national output.

It ought to be pointed out, ofcourse, that downgrading Continental-style capitalism and awarding high marks to the red-blooded Anglo-Saxon version is part of the purpose of these global rankings. The construction of the index reflects the value judgements of its compilers. Quite a few European economies have higher average incomes per head and higher productivity levels than the UK, but this gets a relatively low weight in the World Economic Forum index.

For this reason the new index of `micro-economic competitiveness' which is fed into the overall ranking is rather more interesting. It burrows deeper than the value-laden big picture to assess countries on their basic infrastructure of education and technology, and their capacity to innovate. This is the ultimate source of long-run economic prosperity.

It is not only the UK that is slipping on this front. So is the US, where similar weaknesses in basic education mean the country is not producing enough scientists and engineers. Nor is it able to drain brains from abroad in the way it used to. The competitiveness rankings could soon look very different if the countries near the top now do not build the capacity for future technological innovation.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in