Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Outlook: Barclays/B&C

Friday 08 January 1999 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

IS BARCLAYS just accident prone, or is there something seriously wrong? Just as things were beginning to settle after Martin Taylor's sensational departure as chief executive, up pops another nasty surprise - an unprovided- for liability in respect of the collapse of British & Commonwealth.

This went entirely unmentioned at the time of Mr Taylor's walkout, even though the out-of-court settlement announced yesterday was already under active negotiation by the Centre for Dispute Resolution. The pounds 1.9bn pre- tax profit the bank then said it expected to make for last calendar year took no account of this new liability.

We shouldn't perhaps be too hard on Barclays for holding back. The B&C collapse was an awfully long time ago, and the deal that caused it, the acquisition of the semi-fraudulent Atlantic Computers, even longer. What's more, it was well known that legal proceedings against Barclays in connection with this acquisition were still outstanding.

And in any case, companies tend as a matter of course not to provide for legal cases against them, since to do so might be seen as a partial admission of liability. All the same, this is an alarmingly large sum of money unexpectedly to kiss goodbye to, even if going to court might have been to risk more. Investors can only pray that it marks the final piece of bad news to come crawling out of the woodwork.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in