Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Outlook: Active fund managers find their place in the sun one

Thursday 16 September 1999 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

ACTIVE FUND managers have struggled to keep up with the market in recent years, but finally they seem once more to be getting their place in the sun. Pension funds achieved a rate of return of 2.9 per cent on UK equities in the second quarter of this year, according to the latest WM Company survey, well ahead of the index return of 2.3 per cent. This is the second quarter in succession that active managers have outperformed, and although the degree of outperformance is hardly anything to write home about, this has none the less been a welcome respite from the onwards and upwards march of the index trackers.

Unfortunately, two swallows do not a summer make, and many of the actively managed funds will have since started to underperform again. The cyclical and smaller company shares which sustained them in the first half of the year have come off the boil with a vengeance, particularly in the last few weeks, undermining the performance of many "value" driven funds. So is it game, set and match to the low-cost passive managers afterall?

By no means. The smarter active fund managers who combine the value approach with a degree of growth stock selection are continuing to win mandates with the big pension funds, despite their higher charges. If investing in both value and growth stocks sounds a bit like indexation in disguise, this is because it is. Even so, clever stock selection should still allow the actively managed fund to outperform by avoiding the real losers and maintaining a reasonable smattering of winners. It is managers that concentrate exclusively either on value or growth techniques that seem to lose out to the trackers in the long term.

Both techniques have their strengths, but they tend to come into their own at differing points in the economic cycle. Value concentrates on stocks that appear to have become oversold and look cheap relative to the worth of their assets. In theory, everything eventually returns to norm, so those assets ought one day to start earning a reasonable rate of return again. The upswing in value stocks therefore tends to come in periods when economic growth is beginning to accelerate from a low level and inflationary expectations are starting to rise once more. This leads to the anticipation of greater pricing power and higher earnings.

This served the value funds well in the first half of this year, but where's the inflation and the pricing power? The evidence is that it is just not coming through. Companies are finding it ever harder to push through price rises. The recent rise in interest rates and the pound will make it tougher still. So it's back to growth stocks again - high value companies like mobile phone operators with potentially very high levels of growth. If the future is as Gordon Brown, the Chancellor, sees it, one of high growth and very low inflation, then this is where the value will lie, not in traditional value stocks.

The cleverer active managers will have balanced these factors in their appraisal of the future, and are now busy proving that it is indeed possible to beat the index over the long term - albeit not spectacularly. To do that, you have to go out on a limb. And if you go out on a limb, you will by definition eventually end up spectacularly underperforming.

u

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in