One-stop answer to subsidence wrangles
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Insurance companies are working on a 'one-stop' system for people who face difficulty in claiming for subsidence repairs because they must deal with two different companies.
Homeowners who have switched companies to get lower premiums may find their new insurer will pay for only part of the repairs, because some of the damage occurred while the house was insured by a previous policy.
The new system is being developed by the Association of British Insurers (ABI). Some companies already operate an informal system whereby the present insurer pays the full claim and recovers some from the previous company. Now the ABI is trying to set up a formal agreement for all members. About 150 of its 450-plus members sell buildings insurance.
Tony Baker, ABI's public affairs manager, said: 'The aim is that where there has been a change of insurer but not of owner, the policyholder would not be inconvenienced in making a claim. They would contact the insurer on risk at the time the claim arises. That company would have the right of 'subrogation' to the previous insurer.'
The agreement would not extend to cases where people move house and discover that there is subsidence which pre-dates the cover they take when they move in.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments