Oftel tells BT to cut line costs for rivals
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.OFTEL, the telecommunications regulator, is to boost competition in the market by making it easier and cheaper for BT's rivals, including Mercury and cable television companies, to use the company's telephone network, writes Mary Fagan.
BT's annual revenue, including payments from rivals for the use of the network, amounts to several hundred million pounds.
The plan will force BT to split its businesses in accounting terms by March 1995 to show it pays the same as its rivals for using the telephone lines.
Oftel will monitor and publish the way BT allocates its costs to ensure charges are fairly calculated.
Ultimately, the watchdog may also introduce a limit on how much BT can charge for using the network.
BT attacked the move as 'a costly increase in regulation at time when government attention is focused on deregulation'.
The company had argued its network should be regulated only when other operators have no option but to use BT's system to complete calls.
A spokesman for BT said: 'All this is cranking up the regulatory scenario. We are seeing more intrusive regulation when what we would like to see is some sign that as competition increases, regulation will be rolled back.'
However Don Cruickshank, the director-general of telecommunications, said that the interests of customers came before those of companies and their shareholders.
He said he must give confidence to those willing to invest in new telecommunications services in the UK.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments