Oftel orders BT to raise chargecard price
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Don Cruickshank, the telecommunications regulator, yesterday used his new competition powers for the first time by ordering British Telecom to raise the price of its popular chargecard service.
The ruling came on the same day that BT revealed increases in chargecard call prices, a move it insisted was pre-planned. But Oftel, the watchdog, warned the action may not be enough.
Almost 15 million customers have chargecards, which allow them to charge calls made from payphones and other handsets to their home or office bill. BT has 92 per cent of the market while its nearest competitor, Mercury, has just 7 per cent.
Oftel said it had acted after competitors complained BT's chargecard revenues did not cover costs. The group charges an average of 11p a minute for calls.
"The low retail prices set by BT mean other operators cannot compete on equal price terms in offering chargecard services, especially to residential customers," Mr Cruickshank said.
BT admitted it was losing money on the chargecard and said that from 7 August it would introduce a single 20p-a-minute rate for all inland calls, a move which had no connection with Oftel's announcement.
A spokesman said: "This is a bit silly because we were already doing this anyway and Oftel was aware of that. We are surprised and a bit disappointed."
But Oftel said its order still stood. "We're not sure the new prices meet our concerns either. The onus is now on BT to prove they're not anti- competitive."
Mr Cruickshank won the fair trading condition, which gives him the power to ban any behaviour he believes is anti-competitive, after beating off a High Court challenge by BT last year.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments