Oftel clears BT of dirty tricks
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.BT was largely exonerated yesterday from allegations that it had improperly canvassed ex-directory cable customers, in a report issued by the telecoms watchdog Oftel.
But the regulator called on the company to improve its standards in the future, saying that any campaign to win back customers "should meet the highest standards of fairness and propriety". A spokesman from BT said: "We're clearly delighted that Oftel has vindicated BT. There was no dirty- tricks campaign. Oftel has confirmed that it was an honest mistake made through a computer error."
The Cable Communications Association was last night considering whether to take additional action. Its chief executive, Bob Frost, said that the main issue - whether ex-directory cable customers had been addressed by name in BT's "win back" campaign - had not been resolved.
In a statement accompanying the report, Oftel director-general Don Cruickshank said he accepted BT's explanation relating to the computer glitch. BT claimed that in a list of phone numbers generated by an outside supplier, a coding error had led to some digits being changed. Of these, some were ex-directory accounts.
Mr Cruickshank said that the claim of some customers to have been marketed by their own names lay with a lack of adequate scripting, training and monitoring, which had given cable customers an incorrect impression. He also warned that "immediate enforcement" would follow any recurrence of the episode. BT last night said it had reviewed its procedures "to ensure that everyone maintains the proper standards".
The cable industry gave a muted response to the Oftel report. Telewest Communications, the industry leader, said: "Whether by accident or intent, we believe BT's actions were anti-competitive and unneccesary."A spokesman added: "BT should now apologise to the customers concerned and to the cable companies affected."
Bell Cablemedia, some of whose customers had also been contacted by BT marketers in recent months, said: "We look forward to BT's confirmation ... of the new procedures it now intends to set up in order to avoid a repeat of such a situation." BCM said the episode confirmed that Oftel was right to request additional powers to enforce open competition in the telecoms industry.
BT's board meets today to discuss whether to accept Oftel's plans to take on the new powers of enforcement. The company is fighting the proposals, arguing that they should include a formal right of appeal.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments