Nuclear scheme 'hopelessly optimistic'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A NEW nuclear power station at Sizewell C in Suffolk would be uncompetitive with alternative investments in power generation, according to the independent energy consultancy, Oxera. It says ministers should reject proposals for the plant, writes Mary Fagan.
In a damning submission to the Government's nuclear review, Oxera says Nuclear Electric's calculations on the viability of Sizewell C are 'hopelessly optimistic'.
It adds that the environmental arguments in favour of nuclear power are far from established and that, in the short term, reductions in emissions from coal-fired and gas-fired stations could be achieved more cheaply by managing demand for electricity.
Oxera deals a further blow by calling for a break-up of Nuclear Electric, which generates 25 per cent of the electricity in England and Wales. It suggests giving at least one large modern power station to Scottish Nuclear, and creating a separate company for the Sizewell B pressurised water reactor, now nearing completion.
The industry would like to be privatised. However, Dieter Helm, author of the report, argues that decommissioning risks would command a high premium that would deter investors.
He favours maintaining a nuclear option for long-term environmental reasons but says privatisation could spell the end for the industry. He believes that if Nuclear Electric, Scottish Nuclear and British Nuclear Fuels were privatised, they would choose to invest in gas for new power stations unless the Government subsidised new nuclear plants.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments