Nuclear Electric hopes that no nukes will be good news
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.NUCLEAR Electric is considering changing its name to Safeco, in a bid to upgrade its public image, writes Mary Fagan.
The state-owned electricity generator has appointed advisers Thornton Drummond and Brett to find a new name for the company, which has ambitions in the private sector.
The list of 15 titles being considered includes Safeco, Envirogen, GenCo and Britannia Electric, but nothing relating to nuclear power. Other choices in the drive to find a friendly and dynamic image are British Energy, New Electric and National Electricity.
Nuclear Electric has made privatisation the central issue in its submission to the Government's review of the nuclear industry. The company, however, wants to leave the ageing Magnox reactors and about pounds 9bn in historic liabilities in public hands.
The new name would apply only to the privatised part of Nuclear Electric with its family of Advanced Gas Cooled reactors and pressurised water reactors. That would still have liabilities of pounds 6bn.
Its campaign received a blow yesterday when the Nuclear Industry Forum, representing dozens of companies in the nuclear, construction and related industries, said privatisation was not necessary for Britain's nuclear industry to succeed.
The forum wants to shift the emphasis towards forming a partnership with the Government to promote the building of more PWRs, starting with Sizewell C in Suffolk. The forum says the potential export market is worth pounds 500bn, but the industry needs a solid home base on which to grow.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments