Report slates railways for being 'risk averse'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Britain's railway bosses are obsessed with safety at the expense of performance and value for money, says a report commissioned by the Government.
Britain's railway bosses are obsessed with safety at the expense of performance and value for money, says a report commissioned by the Government.
The report - published just as the Hatfield trial ends its first week at the Old Bailey - argues that the string of rail disasters over the past few years has created a "pervasive and self-sustaining culture of risk-averse or over-cautious behaviour in the UK rail industry".
Prepared by the management consultancy Arthur D Little for Alistair Darling, the Secretary of State for Transport, the report is bound to cause controversy. It catalogues a series of problems with the so-called risk-averse culture.
"Decisions that in the past were made by competent, front-line staff are being taken by more senior management who lack the technical expertise," the report says. The rail industry relies on "excessive analysis instead of professional judge- ment, to protect against personal liability," it argues.
And too many decisions are made by committee to spread responsibility.
This leads to insufficient "incentives to keep the railway running", "a lack of clear leadership" and "poor relationships and communication both within and between organisations".
A spokeswoman for the Department for Transport said that the report had "informed our thinking" on the policies to reform the structure of the railways. This will lead to the abolition of the Strategic Rail Authority by the autumn. It will also see the Health and Safety Executive lose its responsibility for the railways, with the powers passing to the Office of Rail Regulation.
While it doesn't name the culprits, much of the criticism in the Arthur D Little report is thought to be aimed at Network Rail, which owns the track and rail infrastructure.
A Network Rail spokesman said: "We feel that we have got over these issues and we now provide the tools to allow people to make sound decisions."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments