MPs call for £2bn to hit skills target
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Public Accounts Committee (PAC) said £3.7bn had already been spent under its skills-for-life scheme. It warned that an extra £2bn would be needed to hit the Government's targets to improve the skills of 2.25 million adults by 2010.
The committee, which reviews the way public money is spent, hailed the aim of improving numeracy and literacy as "laudable" but said the task ahead was "huge". Edward Leigh MP, the chairman of the PAC, said the low level of literacy and numeracy in the adult population was bad for national productivity and for those individuals struggling to cope with work and daily life. He said: "No one knows exactly how much more money will be needed from 2006 to 2010 - on current patterns, perhaps more than £2bn. The Government must harden up its estimates of future costs and must also zealously hold the line against any dilution of qualification standards."
The PAC praised the Department for Education and Skills for hitting its first milestone of 750,000 adults achieving qualifications by July 2004 but said the future targets were "challenging".
It said that if the targets were to be met, the Department should ensure that employers of people with low skills identified employees who needed help to improve; companies encouraged people to take up appropriate training; people continued learning as their personal circumstances changed; better joined-up working between government agencies; and collaboration from employers.
But the Government insisted it was too soon to see progress because the strategy started from such a low base.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments