Metronet collapse 'cost taxpayers millions'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The collapse of Tube maintenance company Metronet landed the taxpayer with a bill of between £170m and £410m, a report from a Government spending watchdog said today.
The Metronet failure has meant London Underground (LU) passengers have not seen all the promised improvements on the Tube, the report from the National Audit Office (NAO) said.
Metronet went into administration in July 2007 predominantly because of poor corporate governance and leadership, the report added.
The NAO said that when Metronet failed the taxpayer was left exposed. NAO added it saw Transport for London's (TfL) takeover of Metronet as an interim solution and the DfT needed to consider how to reduce future risks to the taxpayer.
Edward Leigh MP, chairman of the House of Commons Public Accounts Committee, said: "The news that the failure of Metronet has cost the taxpayer hundreds of millions of pounds and led to the cancellation of much needed improvement work on the London Underground will not be welcomed either by the taxpayer or by passengers who use London's creaking Tube network.
"Most of the blame for Metronet's going into administration must lie at the door of the company itself and its poor governance arrangements and leadership.
"But it is baffling - given how much taxpayer money was at stake - that the DfT sat back and decided not to get involved in trying to sort the Metronet mess out.
"Instead, the DfT passed the buck to LU and LU reciprocated by passing back the bill."
Mr Leigh said that the lack of a formal role for the DfT in the PPP (the Tube public private partnership) contract made it harder for the department to get a grip on the unfolding situation, but it did not even try to.
He went on: "LU knew in February 2006 of Metronet's prediction that it would overspend by more than £1bn.
"But it took more than a year before it started to become clear exactly how much the taxpayer would have to bear of that projected overspend.
"Now the challenge is for TfL and the DfT to agree a permanent solution that satisfies both taxpayers and London travellers."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments