Ernst & Young faces scrutiny over Equitable Life accounts
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Equitable Life's former auditors, Ernst & Young, will come under fresh scrutiny this week for its role in signing-off accounts which estimated the society could face liabilities that were 30 times lower than the actual level.
E&Y passed 1999's accounts last March, which estimated that court action over guaranteed annuity rates (GARs) would cost Equitable no more than £50m. But a Treasury return made by Equitable last year said the bill for fulfilling its obligations to GARs could run to £1.59bn.
A spokesman for E&Y said that the 1999 accounts were a "fair representation of Equitable's finances based on circumstances relevant at the time".
They followed a Court of Appeal decision which upheld the view that Equitable did not have to increase payments to 70,000 GAR policyholders. But both the set of accounts and the Treasury return came ahead of the House of Lords ruling last July, which went against predictions by forcing Equitable to increase its payouts to GARs. These payouts now appear to be worth collectively £1.5bn.
The actions of E&Y, which has resigned as Equitable's auditors, will be featured in the BBC's File on 4 radio programme tomorrow. The auditors are also being investigated, along with other former advisers, by the law firm Herbert Smith for Equitable to establish whether any party can be held responsible for the demise of the once-vaunted life assurer.
A spokesman for Equitable said: "The board has asked Herbert Smith to scrutinise the society's records to see whether legal action can be taken against its former directors or auditors."
Meanwhile, officials with Equitable have been meeting policyholders and indications are that the compromise proposals are receiving sufficient support, though many policyholders are unhappy.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments