Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Equitable members group launches action

Katherine Griffiths
Wednesday 13 February 2002 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Equitable Life's celebration that it has finally capped £1.5bn of liabilities came to an abrupt end yesterday when a group of disgruntled former policyholders became the first faction to announce steps toward suing the society for lost earnings.

The Equitable Late Joiners Action Group (ELJAG) has appointed the City law firm Travers Smith Braithwaite to pursue Equitable for compensation for investors who have lost on average 23 per cent of the value of their funds over the past year.

The group, made up of 300 former members, alleges that Equitable misled them about the size of liabilities arising from the existence of guaranteed annuity rate (GARs) policies.

An estimated 140,000 individuals joined Equitable after September 1998, the point at which the society embarked on testing its controversial strategy of paying out smaller bonuses to GARs in court.

ELJAG says that at the time, Equitable's salesforce told new clients it would only have to find about £50m in compensation if the courts ruled against the differentiated bonus policy.

The total bill turned out to be more than £1.5bn when the House of Lords said in July 2000 that bonuses to GARs had to be increased, creating a massive liability which destabilised the society and forced it to close to new business.

Neil Britten, the chairman of ELJAG, said: "Equitable began the legal action in the knowledge that the cost of losing could be in the billions. If we had known that we would never have invested with it."

Travers Smith Braithwaite will examine the cases of the 300 former policyholders who have already handed over £250 in fees to support a class action. It hopes other late joiners who have now left Equitable will join.

Equitable will defend itself against an action. It has made a undisclosed provision in case it does have to pay compensation.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in