Divisions deepen over Pfizer's spurned bid for AstraZeneca
Support truly
independent journalism
Our mission is to deliver unbiased, fact-based reporting that holds power to account and exposes the truth.
Whether $5 or $50, every contribution counts.
Support us to deliver journalism without an agenda.
![Louise Thomas](https://static.independent.co.uk/static-assets/support-us/louise-thomas.png)
Louise Thomas
Editor
The splits between big investors over AstraZeneca's decision to reject Pfizer's takeover attempt deepened yesterday.
The fund management titan Neil Woodford said he is "convinced that an independent AstraZeneca will achieve far better returns… than the combination of cash and Pfizer paper would have delivered."
Fidelity's chief investment officer Dominic Rossi, said: "I don't think that Pfizer was a suitable partner. It was motivated by tax and finance considerations.
"The Astra board has taken a very difficult decision. They understood in rejecting the offer they would be criticised by some shareholders. We will now have to wait two to three years to see whether they were right"
In contrast, Schroders was disappointed by the "quick rejection" and called on the UK group "to recommence their engagement with Pfizer".
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments