Cost of Red Bull's F1 dominance tops £420m
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Austrian energy-drinks company Red Bull has spent a total of £422.4m on Formula One (F1) since buying its team from Ford at the end of 2004, according to new research.
The Milton Keynes-based team won last year's world championship with the German driver Sebastian Vettel, who also leads this year's standings and who won yesterday's Monaco Grand Prix. Data from F1 trade guide Formula Money shows that in 2005, its first full year as a team owner, Red Bull spent £58.3m on the sport. By 2009, its investment had nearly doubled to £106.8m as Red Bull fuelled the team's title-winning campaign.
To maximise lead time, development work on F1 cars is done the year before they are introduced and in 2009, Red Bull's spending on research and development increased by 18.8 per cent to £57.2m. It also spent £4.9m on improving its engineering facilities and although staff numbers remained stable at 592, total pay increased by 21.9 per cent to £45.9m. Vettel alone is believed to be paid £9.8m with his partner, Mark Webber, getting around £3.7m.
Red Bull wholly owns the team and provides the funding in return for its logos being emblazoned almost all over its livery. The team made a pre-tax profit of £3.9m on revenue of £160.8m in 2009 but according to Formula Money's data, factoring in the value of the brand's on-screen exposure gives a big boost to its return.
Red Bull has the most prominent logos on its team's livery and its on-track success made it the most visible brand in the sport for the past two years running. Red Bull's "advertising value equivalent" – the price it would have to pay to buy a similar amount of on-screen exposure – came to an estimated £136.9m in 2009 and £219.9m in 2010, when it received almost a quarter of the total received by all the teams.
Although it took victory last year, Red Bull was not the most cost-effective team in F1. That accolade went to McLaren which came second and narrowly missed out on the title despite having a much smaller budget than its rival Red Bull.
McLaren's budget is estimated at £158.9m compared with the £185.2m available to Red Bull. It led to McLaren's spending coming to around £350,000 per point it scored compared with £374,000 for Red Bull.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments