Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

BrightHouse: Rent-to-own firm agrees to pay £14.8m for mistreating consumers

The compensation is linked to 384,000 customer lending agreements which ‘may not have been affordable’ and payments ‘which should have been refunded’

Ravender Sembhy
Tuesday 24 October 2017 09:36 BST
Comments
BrightHouse, which provides household goods to customers on hire purchase agreements, has been working with the FCA since 2014
BrightHouse, which provides household goods to customers on hire purchase agreements, has been working with the FCA since 2014 (Reuters)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Rent-to-own firm BrightHouse has agreed to pay out £14.8m in redress to 249,000 customers after the financial watchdog found that it did not act as a “responsible lender”.

The compensation is linked to 384,000 customer lending agreements which “may not have been affordable” and payments “which should have been refunded”, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) said.

BrightHouse, which provides household goods to customers on hire purchase agreements, has been working with the FCA since 2014 after the watchdog identified the firm’s lending assessment and collections processes fell short of its expectations.

The FCA said that the group “did not always deliver good outcomes for customers, particularly those who were at a higher risk of falling into financial difficulty”.

BrightHouse has “identified customers that may have been treated unfairly where its processes fell short of FCA expectations” and has committed to “putting things right” for these customers.

Where it is determined that customers were not assessed properly at the outset of the loan and may have had difficulty making payments, and providing they handed back the goods, BrightHouse will be paid back the interest and fees charged under the agreement, plus compensatory interest of 8 per cent.

Customers who retained the goods will have their balances written off. This part of the redress totals around £10.1m for 114,000 agreements entered into between April 1 2014 and September 30 2016, covering 81,000 customers.

Those customers who made the first payment due under an agreement with the firm which was cancelled prior to the delivery of the goods will be refunded by BrightHouse plus receive compensatory interest of 8 per cent. This redress totals around £4.7m for 270,000 agreements entered into after 1 April 2010 covering 181,000 customers.

BrightHouse will write to all affected customers, some of whom are affected by both sets of circumstances, to explain the refund or balance adjustment that they will receive.

The FCA added that BrightHouse has worked to improve its lending application assessment to ensure that loans are affordable and customers are treated fairly during the collections process, including revising its late payment fee structure.

Jonathan Davidson, executive director of supervision at the FCA, said: “During the time in question, BrightHouse was not a responsible lender and failed to meet our expectations of firms in this sector.

“I am pleased that it has agreed to provide redress to those customers affected by these historic practices.

“This scheme continues our work with the rent-to-own sector to resolve the concerns we have previously identified.

“Responsible lending and the fair treatment of consumers, especially those in financial difficulties or who are vulnerable, are key priorities for us.”

PA

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in