Barclays fined another $150m over forex-rigging scandal
Fine adds to the $485m the bank agreed to pay New York’s Department of Financial Services in May as part of a wider £1.5bn settlement with UK and US authorities
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Barclays, Britain’s second-largest bank, is to pay an extra $150m (£99m) to US regulators to resolve allegations of its role in rigging foreign-exchange rates.
New York’s Department of Financial Services also ordered the bank to dismiss the global head of electronic fixed income, currencies and commodities automated flow trading.
The fine is higher than the $100m the industry was expecting. It adds to the $485m Barclays agreed to pay the regulator in May as part of a wider £1.5bn settlement with UK and US authorities.
The settlement was related to misconduct in a system called “Last Look”. NYDFS said that in certain instances, it was used to automatically reject client orders that would be unprofitable for the bank. “Furthermore, when clients questioned Barclays about these rejected trades, Barclays failed to disclose the reason that the trades were being rejected, instead citing technical issues or providing vague responses.”
In 2011, the Barclays managing director and head of automated electronic FX wrote to some staff: “Do not discuss Last Look with sales. If there has been a spurt [in rejected trades] just blame it on the weekend IT release and say it’s being fixed.”
Anthony Albanese, acting superintendent of financial services, said: “This case highlights the need for greater oversight and action to help prevent the misuse of automated, electronic trading platforms on Wall Street, which is a wider industry issue that requires serious additional scrutiny.”
The fine comes ahead of the arrival of Barclays new chief executive, Jes Staley, who starts in early December.
Barclays confirmed it had reached a settlement with NYDFS over the investigation that looked at the period 2009-14. The civil penalty will be reflected in the bank’s fourth quarter results.
It added that it “continues to co-operate with other ongoing investigations and to manage related litigation risks as previously disclosed”.
However Barclays, and other banks, could still face civil actions brought by clients or investors who claim they lost money in the forex scandal. Shares in Barclays rose 0.45p to 227.9p.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments