Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

BA blames Iberia merger delay on 'technical issues'

Sarah Arnott
Thursday 01 April 2010 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

British Airways' merger with Iberia of Spain will not take place in the first quarter of this year as planned because of "technical issues", the UK flag carrier said yesterday.

BA was not prepared to go into any detail, saying only that the agreement would be signed "in due course" and blaming delays on "technical issues that need to be resolved".

It is understood the hold-ups are not related to BA's cabin crew strikes – the second of which finished at midnight on Tuesday. The company's £3bn pensions deficit is also not thought to be a factor, although it was central to the 18-month negotiations before the deal was finally agreed in November.

Under the terms of the agreement, BA will hold 55 per cent of the new company, Iberia 45 per cent. The merger should lead to £350m of efficiency savings, the two airlines have said.

Meanwhile, BA yesterday faced another round of complaints from rival Virgin Atlantic over plans for closer links with American Airlines (AA). Ownership regulations preclude a merger between the two carriers, but they have submitted plans to regulators in the US and Europe under which they would share revenues and jointly manage schedules, pricing and capacity on transatlantic routes.

Virgin has vociferously opposed the move since BA and AA first applied for formal Anti-Trust Immunity (ATI) in the US in August 2008. In February, the US Department of Transportation (DoT) launched a 60-day consultation on its preliminary plan to clear the tie-up providing the airlines gave up four pairs of daily take-off and landing slots on the highly competitive London-to-New York route. Virgin's response, submitted to the DoT yesterday, brands the plan as "massively uncompetitive", highlighting the "sheer inadequacy" of the conditions imposed by the department and the "potential competitive harm" if the deal is allowed to proceed.

Virgin also attackedBA's claims that regulatory clearance would allow the Oneworld alliance, to which BA, AA and Iberia all belong, to compete with the much larger Star Alliance and Skyteam groups, both of which already have monopoly immunity on transatlantic flights.

"The fact is that approval of this deal would distort competition further, not restore it," said Sir Richard Branson, the president of Virgin Atlantic. "If the regulators take this decision on the false assumption that a three alliance vision can meet all competitive needs they will be making a big mistake and doing a disservice to consumers."

In a parallel regulatory process, BA last month approached the European watchdog with an offer to lease out four daily pairs of slots from Heathrow, plus another two if the competitive environment between on the London-to-New York route changes. Virgin described the concessions as "woefully inadequate". The EU is also inviting responses from the industry.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in