Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Australian approval for Xstrata's MIM deal

Our City Staff
Tuesday 17 June 2003 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Xstrata won approval from the Queensland Supreme Court yesterday to go ahead with a A$3.4bn (£1.35bn) takeover of the Australian miner MIM Holdings in a deal that will double the size of the coal and zinc miner.

The A$1.72-a-share offer was approved by the Australian coal, copper and zinc miner's shareholders on 6 June. Small shareholders voted for the takeover despite opposition from MIM's chief executive, Vince Gauci, who insisted until the end that UK-listed Xstrata, eager to expand beyond its base in South Africa, was buying the company too cheaply.

With the court's approval in hand, trade in MIM's shares was suspended on the Australian Stock Exchange from yesterday's close of trade.

MIM last traded up two cents at the takeover price of A$1.72. Xstrata shares ended down 8p at 439p yesterday. Xstrata said it would delay its first-half earnings report to 17 September, from 28 July.

Australian securities regulators had raised concern the shareholder vote in favour of the offer might have been won unfairly through share-splitting by institutional investors. This involves the break-up of large parcels of shares into smaller parcels which are then registered with new owners who vote in a pre-arranged way.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in