NEWS : War threatens BP pipeline project
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE RUSSIAN invasion of Chechnya has thrown a barricade in the path of a $10bn (£6.7bn) oil project planned by British Petroleum and 10 partners in the Caucasus.
The Chechen capital, Grozny, devastated by heavy fighting over the past three weeks, is the focal point of the region's oil and gas supply network.
A BP spokesman said the company was watching events in the republic closely. The shortest of three potential pipeline routes from Azerbaijan to world markets passes through Chechnya.
The consortium signed a $7bn deal with Azerbaijan in September to develop the Azeri, Chirag and Guneshli fields under the Caspian Sea, which are believed to contain reserves of 55 billion tonnes, equivalent to a major North Sea field. It is looking at three possible routes for a $3bn export pipeline. Two of them - to the Mediterranean or the Gulf - run through Iran, and are not popular with the consortium's American members, which include Amoco, Pennzoil and Unocal. Those routes would also be vulnerableto attacks from Armenians or Kurds.
The remaining route, through Chechnya to Novorossiysk, Russia's main Black Sea oil terminal, is the shortest and crosses the easiest terrain. But prolonged conflict in the republic could endanger the project. The Russian air force has bombed the city's refinery, despite interior ministry assurances that "energy enterprises" in Chechnya would not be targeted.
Although the pipeline will not be needed for at least five years, a decision on the route is likely to be taken much earlier. Russia, which has a 10 per cent interest in the project through Lukoil, favours the route through Grozny to Novorossiysk.
The republic is one of Russia's oldest oil provinces. Some fields have been operating for almost a century. As its fields have dried up, production has declined from 20 million tonnes in 1970 to 800,000 tonnes in 1993, according to Jonathan Stern, vice-president of Gas Strategies, an industrial consultancy.
But it remains a major transit point. Grozny is a hub for two major oil pipelines, linking the producing and refining areas of Astrakhan and Baku with Novorossiysk, and a host of natural gas routes.
The Grozny oil refinery, which has a capacity of 18 million tonnes a year, is said to be in poor repair but has become more significant to Russia since the collapse of the Soviet Union. It lost much of its refining capacity when other republics became independent, said Stuart Christie, editor of CIS Oil and Gas Report.
Rumours in Moscow at the start of the war suggested the real motivation for the invasion was a decision by the Chechen government to privatise some of its oil and gas infrastructure. Western analysts place little credence in this theory, however.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments