Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

NatWest and BZW win BES dispute

Paul Durman
Friday 30 July 1993 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

NATIONAL Westminster Bank and Barclays de Zoete Wedd yesterday won a legal battle with the Inland Revenue that will allow about 3,200 investors to receive a generous tax relief on the Business Expansion Scheme investments they made just before the last Budget, writes Paul Durman.

The Budget put an immediate end to the loanback schemes that BES sponsors used to offer higher-rate taxpayers annualised returns of almost 30 per cent after only six months.

The High Court ruled that investors in the NatWest and BZW schemes should qualify for tax relief since shares had been alloted by midnight on the day before the Budget. The Inland Revenue had argued the schemes should not qualify since shares had not been issued to investors. It has 28 days to appeal.

Separately, it emerged yesterday that the Investment Management Regulatory Organisation recently fined NatWest pounds 10,000 and pounds 3,208 of costs because an advertisement for its Homeshare BES failed to include the necessary risk warning.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in