NAPF backs down on pension proposal
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE National Association of Pension Funds has backed down on its controversial proposal for a compensation scheme that would make good shortfalls in pension payments irrespective of the reason that gave rise to them.
The NAPF's submission to the pension law review being conducted by Professor Roy Goode restricts the proposed compensation to covering fraud, theft and criminal negligence. This would no longer offer protection to members of pension schemes that were underfunded.
Brian Matthews, finance director of the Electricity Supply Pension Scheme, which threatened to resign from the NAPF over the earlier proposal, said the change went 80 per cent of the way to meeting its objections. But the ESPS is still unhappy with the proposed funding for compensation.
The NAPF's other proposals included an annual solvency test to ensure pension funds can meet their commitments on winding up, and a tribunal to settle disputes between trustees and employers.
It also wants a strengthened Occupational Pensions Board as the main regulator and an agreed funding policy for the scheme to be disclosed to members.
Meanwhile the Society of Pension Consultants has proposed a compensation scheme, funded through the Government's National Insurance Fund, which would cover underfunding.
The scheme would seek to ensure employees received the pension rights that should be clearly set out in their conditions of employment.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments