MPs formally rebuke MPC member
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.SUSHIL WADHWANI, the new member of the Bank of England's Monetary Policy Committee, was formally rebuked by the Treasury Select Committee yesterday, writes Phil Thornton.
The MPs criticised him for borrowing heavily on the replies given by other members of the MPC at their confirmation hearing when he filled out a questionnaire. The committee approved the appointment of Dr Wadhwani, who joins the MPC next month.
But in its report it said: "We hope he will remember he is a member of the MPC as an individual with individual responsibility and independent views."
A source close to the committee described the rebuke as "a slight bollocking".
Mr Wadhwani escaped an attempt by Brian Sedgemore, a Labour MP on the Treasury Select Committee, to block his appointment on the grounds that he did not show the "necessary personal independence to serve on the MPC".
Mr Sedgemore had accused Dr Wadhwani of "letting down the Chancellor and insulting the committee" during a heated exchange during Monday's confirmation hearing.
Dr Wadhwani apologised to the committee, saying he copied replies where he agreed with the point, because he wanted to avoid speculators "nit- picking" over his choice of words.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments