MPs attack Post Office for pounds 10m ATM windfall
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.POST OFFICE bosses came under fire for having fee-charging cash machines in their branches, after it emerged that consumers spend about pounds 10m a year withdrawing money from them.
Angela Eagle, an MP on the Treasury Committee, which is investigating cash machine charges, questioned why post offices installed fee-charging ATMs if cash was available free of charge over the counter.
The Post Office said it was working to bring more charge-free banking to consumers and had applied to join Link, the network of free ATMs. It insisted it was not making money from the machines, which typically charge pounds 1.50 a time, with the bulk going to the owner of the ATM machine. It also pointed out that 97 per cent of cash transactions at the country's 15,000 post offices were free.
John McFall, the chairman of the committee, said he was concerned that the people worst hit by the charges were those collecting benefits. Faced with a 15-minute wait in a queue, people would be tempted to use one of the charging ATMs, he said.
Graham Halliday from the Post Office admitted there was a lack of transparency and pledged that signs would be more clearly displayed to distinguish charging cash machines from free ones.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments