MP fights SFO over public hearings
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.FRANK Field, chairman of the Commons Social Security Select Committee, is to fight attempts by the Serious Fraud Office to stop the committee questioning former Maxwell business associates in public hearings, writes Jason Nisse.
Mr Field, Labour MP for Birkenhead, is angry about the encroachment of the SFO into his committee's investigation of the Maxwell scandal. The SFO has argued that the public questioning of people connected with Maxwell, such as Lord Walker and Lord Stevens, may prejudice the trials of Kevin and Ian Maxwell.
The Department of Trade and Industry inquiry into Mirror Group Newspapers is also now unlikely to be published until after the trials have ended, which may not be until 1995.
The scheduled appearance by Basil Brookes, former finance director of Maxwell Communication Corporation, before the committee last Tuesday was cancelled after an eleventh-hour intervention by George Staple, head of the SFO.
Mr Staple met Mr Field and other senior members of the committee on Thursday in an attempt to sort out the problem. During a two-hour meeting, the MPs offered five options to the SFO, including holding the meetings 'in camera', in an attempt to find a compromise solution.
But no agreement was reached and it is understood that Mr Field was angered by the SFO's attitude and is now planning to press for full, open meetings.
It is a question of people 'being forced to face public scrutiny', a source close to the select committee said.
(Photograph omitted)
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments