Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Money: Fear of finance

Clifford German
Saturday 16 November 1996 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

It does not look as if the Chancellor will have much more than pounds 3bn net to give back to taxpayers next April, not now that the health secretary, Stephen Dorrell, has secured an extra pounds 500m to spend on the NHS. A penny off the standard rate and an increase in the starting point for tax bands in line with average earnings are the concessions which would probably best please most taxpayers on 26 November.

Alternatively, a substantial widening of the 20p band would spread a small amount of jam even more widely by benefiting the lowest paid as well as basic-rate taxpayers.

If you take the Prime Minister's recent remarks about priority for cutting income tax literally, however, the chances of the Chancellor abolishing inheritance tax and capital gains tax this month have diminished considerably.

Abolition would cost him pounds 2.5bn in a full year and almost certainly leave the Chancellor with too little in hand to implement a cut in the standard rate of income tax as well.

It would also give a Labour Chancellor the opportunity to score political points by reinstating both taxes after the next election.

The Chancellor could, however, simplify CGT by rebasing the indexation allowance. At present, any realised gains on assets which were owned before 1982 are calculated on their value in 1982 and all taxable gains since then are diluted in line with the retail price index.

But it becomes increasingly difficult as time goes by to put a 1982 value on assets other than quoted stocks and shares which have been held for 14 years or more.

There is also a case for taxing long-term gains less heavily than short- term gains, if only to spike the guns of the shadow Chancellor, Gordon Brown, who would almost certainly introduce a two-level tax next year. Either way, however, it makes little sense for investors to establish a taxable gain, or give away assets to minimise inheritance tax before the Budget.

Mr Clarke could please investors by increasing the amounts which can be invested each year in tax-free Tessas and PEPs, especially if CGT continues.

A move to merge the allowances for single-company PEPs and ordinary PEPs is also quite likely. If he wants to be imaginative, he may try to consolidate the annual amount which can be invested tax-free in Tessas, Peps and pension funds combined, on the grounds that few people can afford to put the maximum available into all three pots, and the current rules on tax relief for pension contributions are forbiddingly complicated. But immediate changes in mid financial year are unlikely.

The housing market is hoping the Chancellor will not further reduce the tax relief on mortgage interest payments, and that he will raise the starting point for stamp duty to exempt more house purchases altogether.

Employees in profit-related pay and company share option schemes are also hoping the Chancellor will reaffirm his support rather than clamp down on over-generous schemes, and venture capital trust promoters are hoping for concessions.

Some taxes seem certain to rise. A controversial 1 per cent increase in VAT would damp down spending and pay for bigger cuts elsewhere.

Petrol and tobacco excise duties are certain to rise, as part of the Government's environmental and social programme, so it will pay to top up before the 26th.

But the Chancellor will be pulled two ways on taxing beer, wines and spirits. Rises in the insurance premium tax and the air passenger duty on travellers using UK airports are quite possible.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in