Modernising costs hit M&G results
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A big investment in modernising systems has depressed profits at M&G, the investment management group, in a year when a majority of its funds underperformed. Underlying profits before tax for the year to 30 September were flat at pounds 61m, but fell to pounds 52m after exceptional costs.
The group, however, stuck to its policy of sustained dividend payments with a 6 per cent rise in the final payment to 18p.
More than half of M&G's dozens of funds are now in the bottom half of the investment performance rankings, as the company said the UK stockmarket did not suit its investment approach, especially in small and medium sized firms and special situations.
The results were distorted by pounds 18.8m exceptional costs, of which nearly pounds 15m related to a rationalisation and modernisation of the group's business processing systems. The overall programme is expected to last nearly three years and cost pounds 20m.
"This has been a year in which we have invested for the future, we are convinced the industry has excellent long-term prospects," said David Morgan, group managing director.
Net assets per share, an indication of the financial strength of the group, increased by 12 per cent to 241p.
Most of the 17 per cent increase in funds under management to pounds 13.8bn was due to asset appreciation. Revenue was up slightly to pounds 78m, driven largely by fees on funds under management. Adminstration expenses rose because of the need to bring investment salaries into line with market levels.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments