Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Mirror board faces sales row

Jason Nisse,City Correspondent
Friday 07 August 1992 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE board of Mirror Group Newspapers has rejected accusations that it has misjudged the tabloid newspaper market after Daily Mirror sales dropped more sharply than expected in July.

MGN agreed to raise the cover prices of the Mirror and its Scottish sister paper, the Daily Record, from 25p to 27p in the middle of July.

Its main rival, the Sun, held its price at 25p and has attacked the Mirror, through its own editorial and through poster advertising. A slogan, 'Don't go overboard for it,' was coined by an executive in the Sun's promotions department. Robert Maxwell, late publisher of the Mirror, died at sea when he fell from his yacht last November.

The campaign appears to have worked. According to Audit Bureau of Circulation figures, during July the circulation of the Mirror and Record dropped by nearly 40,000 to 3.556 million, while the Sun's dropped by only 14,000 to 3.503 million.

These figures are averaged out through the month, and indicate that the falls for the Mirror and Record may have accelerated after the price rise.

This has brought criticism from shareholders and analysts. 'They seem to have misjudged the market,' one analyst said.

'The timing was odd,' said a media expert linked to one of the groups intending to bid for MGN. 'They raised the price into a weak seasonal market when conventional wisdom is that you increase the price in a strong seasonal market, in the spring or early autumn.'

However MGN is robust in defending the move. Roger Eastoe, the advertising director, said that if the Mirror and Record maintained their circulation lead over the Sun the strategy would be a success.

Charles Wilson, editorial director of MGN, said he thought the price rise had gone very well.

Unoffical figures for the week ending 1 August, which have been challenged by Mr Wilson, indicate that the circulation of the two papers may have dropped below that of the Sun for the first time since March.

The sales of the Mirror are estimated by an industry expert to be 2.76 million and of the Record 700,000, while the Sun has held steady at around 3.5 million.

If the figures are backed up officially it will be embarrassing for the MGN board, which faced a great deal of criticism for its connections with Maxwell at last month's annual shareholders' meeting.

MGN shares eased 3p to 70p yesterday.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in