Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Members fight Midshires terms

Andrew Verity
Monday 02 November 1998 01:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

BIRMINGHAM MIDSHIRES is facing a backlash against its de-mutualisation plans from disgruntled borrowers and savers who are seeking a vote to overturn the deal.

Savers who joined the building society after January 1 1996 have gained enough signatures to requisition a special general meeting to discuss alternatives to the Midshires plan, which offers the majority of members just pounds 400 in preference shares. Many mortgage borrowers also believe they have been disadvantaged by the terms of the conversion.

Midshires has blocked an attempt by the members to table a special resolution at its own extraordinary general meeting on December 11, when the Halifax takeover bid will be put to a vote. Save Our Building Societies, the lobby group, now has 138 signatures from members who want to requisition a separate meeting, where alternatives to the Midshires proposals will be discussed.

Only 100 signatures are required for such a meeting.

Members of the society last week made unsolicited calls to the media to voice their frustration at the deal. Paul King, a music agent from Colchester who has been a member since the start of 1996, said:

"I think they are now treating the majority of their members disgracefully. You can't say that any saver who joined the society after a certain date is a carpetbagger."

Save Our Building Societies is now appealing for contributions to a pounds 5,000 deposit, required by Midshires as a condition for holding a separate general meeting. Kerry Pollard MP, a patron of the group, said: "This is not a level playing field, things are stacked against the ordinary members.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in