Maxwell persists in challenge to SFO
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.KEVIN MAXWELL, charged earlier this year with various counts of theft and fraud, is to appeal against a High Court refusal yesterday to allow a challenge on the way the Serious Fraud Office is conducting the inquiry into the collapsed Maxwell empire.
Mr Maxwell was attempting to force a judicial review of the decision by the SFO on two different occasions to refuse to disclose documents upon which its case against Mr Maxwell is based.
Mr Justice Roche refused leave for judicial review, but Mr Maxwell appealed and there will be a hearing in the Divisonal Court on Monday in front of Lord Justices Mann and Leonard.
If successful, the application could undermine the way the SFO operates with its dual role as investigator and prosecutor, unique in the British legal system.
In court Mr Maxwell's lawyers argued that the investigation role, which would usually be taken on by the police, was obscuring the requirements of the proscecution to disclose all elements of its case to the defence before trial.
The SFO said it would pass all documents to Mr Maxwell when it had concluded its investigations. Mr Justice Roche indicated that this could be at the beginning of December, but the SFO would not confirm this.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments