MAM's escape might prove short-lived
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Mercury Asset Management, Britain's largest institutional fund manager, looked poised finally to escape the clutches of its troubled parent, Warburg, following yesterday's announcement of its takeover by Swiss Bank Corporation.
Under the deal, the 75 per cent of MAM shares owned by Warburg will be distributed among Warburg shareholders, giving MAM a market value estimated to be over £1.5bn. But Mercury's wide distribution in the market will expose it to predators.
Speculation quickly returnedin the City that MAM's independence may not last long, given the keen interest among several big financial players to buy their way into the lucrative fund managment business.
There are few large shareholder-owned fund managers in the UK, making MAM a prime target.
NatWest Group is known to have its eyes on MAM, while GE Capital of the US has also made plain its desire to build up its fund management operations in Europe.
Sir David Scholey, chief executive and chairman of Warburg, said yesterday: "Mercury is becoming a widely held and extremely independent public limited company with a very strong capital base and very strong profits. There is no reason for that not to continue."
Relations between Mercury and Warburg had soured dramatically of late, with the fund manager complaining its parent did not have the financial backing it wanted. MAM went openly on the offensive, saying it wanted to be rid of Warburg, after the failure of the planned merger between Warburg and Morgan Stanley late last year.
Despite its strong reputation, MAM is a maturing management business, heavily dependent on one market, UK pension funds. If it wanted to diversify abroad, it would probably have to call on the capital of a bigger parent. But any bidder would have to dig deep, with MAM shares currently at something like 20 times earnings.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments