M&G share option plan wins egm approval
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.M&G's controversial executive share option scheme was approved by an extraordinary general meeting yesterday. The scheme run by the investment management group breaks guidelines set out by fund management trade bodies.
The National Association of Pension Funds and the Association of British Insurers recommend that executive share option schemes link rewards to benchmarks of management performance.
Many option schemes come up for renewal this year, the tenth anniversary of their introduction. Reuters recently announced a new scheme that only gives executives shares if the group's share price outperforms that of other FT-SE 100 companies.
M&G's scheme contains no performance element. Sir David Moneycoutts, chairman, said: 'The best measure of long-term performance is the value shareholders put on the business. A lot of the companies in which we invest were hoping that we would carry the day because they regard benchmarking as far too cumbersome.'
The M&G scheme was passed comfortably thanks to the vote of the Esmee Fairbairn Charitable Trust, which holds more than a third of the shares. But just half the possible votes were cast.
John Rogers, of the NAPF's investment committee, said: 'We anticipated this result, but it might shake up our sleepier members to exercise their votes in future.'
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments