Lockheed and Martin sign dollars 10bn merger: Biggest deal in US defence history set to trigger further consolidation
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.LOCKHEED and Martin Marietta, the second- and third-largest defence contractors in the US, have agreed to the biggest merger in the history of the industry, exchanging dollars 10bn ( pounds 6.7bn) worth of shares.
The deal will create a company with more than dollars 22.5bn in annual sales, almost double those of McDonnell Douglas, the Pentagon's next biggest supplier.
The merger, five months in the making, is expected to trigger another round of consolidation among America's remaining defence contractors, and share prices rose sharply across the sector yesterday. Interest centred on Loral, another company with an ambitious acquisition record, Raytheon, Rockwell and E-Systems, an electronics group that has shunned mergers.
Martin, apparently worried about just such an eventuality, put a poison pill in place, making it prohibitively expensive for a third company to try to break up the deal.
Lockheed Martin, as the merged company will be known, will dominate three key defence sectors - space and missiles, aeronautics and electronics. It will employ 173,000 and have an order backlog of dollars 43bn. About 40 per cent of its business will be non-US Defense Department work, and it will rank as America's 14th-largest industrial group.
The two companies have been among the most aggressive in responding to the sharp decline in US defence spending, acquiring big pieces of former rivals that have decided to leave the weaponry business.
Lockheed, seeking 'critical mass' in an industry that has shrunk almost 70 per cent since the height of the Cold War, last year bought General Dynamics' fighter division, while Martin has purchased the aerospace businesses of General Electric and General Dynamics.
In March, Martin triggered the industry's largest bidding war, offering dollars 2bn for Grumman, only to lose out to a higher offer by Northrop of California.
Although Lockheed is a larger company in terms of sales, shareholders in Martin, the more profitable partner, will end up controlling a majority of the new group's stock. Lockheed's shares, which will be exchanged for 1.63 shares in Lockheed Martin, soared dollars 103 4 to dollars 763 4 yesterday, while Martin's finished up 50 cents at dollars 483 4 .
Norman Augustine, 59, chief executive of Martin, who will succeed Daniel Tellep as Lockheed's chief executive upon his retirement, said: 'These are Darwinian times in our industry. Failure to change is failure to survive.'
Despite the loss of more than a million jobs since the US military 'build-down' began in 1986, the industry still has overcapacity equal to almost two-thirds of the market, analysts say.
As a result, the Pentagon has encouraged consolidation and monopolies regulators have turned a blind eye to otherwise anti-competitive mergers.
Mr Tellep cited tough international competition - 'companies often subsidised by foreign governments, and consolidating across international boundaries' - as one reason for the merger. 'This new company will be able to compete with anyone, anywhere in the world.'
Both men warned of job losses at the new company, whose weapons businesses have already shed tens of thousands in recent years.
Significant savings will come from eliminating duplication in research and development, analysts said. But they held out the hope that new jobs would be created as the group expanded into non-defence businesses.
The new company would almost certainly make additional acquisitions in the future, although these would involve niche products rather than whole contractors.
(Photograph omitted)
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments