Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Local authority financing at risk, says panel

Peter Rodgers
Friday 31 May 1996 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A senior City body, the Financial Law Review Panel, warned yesterday that future private financing of local authority projects was at risk because of serious legal uncertainties.

The panel urged ministers to set up a new tribunal to vet bank deals with local authorities in advance, which would remove the risk that the deals would later be declared illegal.

If the Government failed to do anything, an extension of the Treasury's private finance initiative to local authorities was unlikely to succeed, said the panel.

The PFI uses private money to fund what would otherwise count as public spending and it is a key part of the Chancellor's strategy to reduce his borrowing requirement. Other new types of financing for councils were also at risk, the panel said.

The problem arises from a series of legal cases going back to the Hammersmith and Fulham swaps deals a decade ago, which the courts found to be outside the council's powers.

But the panel, which has been pressing the Government to act for a year, believes court of appeals judgments this month involving Credit Suisse, have increased the urgency.

The judgments confirmed earlier decisions in the lower court that a much wider range of off-balance sheet financing by councils was potentially illegal. These include leasing deals for capital equipment and other direct expenditure, rather than the speculation involved in the swaps deals.

Estimates of the value of existing finance at risk are as high as pounds 3bn, though the panel's chief executive, Colin Bamford, said the highest figure he had heard was pounds 1bn.

But he made it clear the priority was to set up a system to allay City fears that any new deal a bank does with a local authority could similarly be declared ultra vires.

Mr Bamford said "It is pie in the sky to think the private finance initiative will attract banks when they are unable to get legal opinions saying the deal is not going to be void."

The proposed tribunal, would be run by the Audit Commission and would certify that specific deals would not be ultra vires.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in