Lloyd's syndicate acts over rogue transactions
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A LLOYD'S of London insurance syndicate yesterday mounted an urgent damage limitation exercise after two of its employees had quit over allegations of selling unauthorised insurance cover worth more than $150m (pounds 91m).
Hiscox PLC issued out a statement to the Stock Exchange to squash speculation that it had been left exposed to huge losses because of the unauthorised sales at one syndicate, known as syndicate 33.
David Edwards, an underwriter at the syndicate, and his immediate boss, Paul Hunt, resigned after it emerged that Mr Edwards had written insurance business with no authority and failed to record it in the syndicate's records.
Mr Edwards had rushed to sell lucrative insurance contracts to buyers of Chinese and Korean-built ships - business which a separate team in the syndicate was trying to secure. However, he insured the shipyards against credit risks when he was only authorised to insure against physical damage. He also failed to enter the risks on to Hiscox's recording system - meaning the risk did not figure in the company's accounts.
Hiscox, which specialises in non-marine risks such as kidnap and ransom insurance, said it had issued a statement because of speculation the contracts had left the firm exposed to heavy losses if the ship contracts went wrong.
Bronek Masojada, managing director of Hiscox, said: "We believe the speculation has had an impact on trading in Hiscox shares." Shares yesterday stood at 192p, down from a high of 205p in January. Hiscox insisted the business had not left it exposed because it was covered by reinsurance. Hiscox would only have to pay a maximum of pounds 1m.
Mr Masojada said: "There is no hint of impropriety - my view is that [Mr Edwards] thought he had done the right thing. What normally happens is that people only realise what was happening when the claims come in."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments