Lloyd's deputy faces action by members
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE business interests of Stephen Merrett, the newly elected deputy chairman of Lloyd's, face legal action from up to 4,000 underwriting members facing nearly pounds 200m worth of losses.
The angry members crowded into the Royal Geographical Society's hall in Kensington, London, yesterday to hear legal advice from Anthony Boswood QC, the barrister who gained a pounds 116m out- of-court settlement for members of Lloyd's on another troubled syndicate.
In a 50-page legal opinion, Mr Boswood criticised the financial assumptions made by Merrett Underwriting Agency Management, the group looking after syndicate 418, into which the stricken Lloyd's members were grouped. He was also critical of the differing types of treatment that numerous underwriting members received as they participated in the syndicate.
Mr Boswood said that there would be a good case for legal action against the Merrett agency and other agents who introduced members to the syndicate.
Mr Boswood was equally critical of the former Ernst & Whinney, the accountancy firm, which gave an opinion that the accounts of the Merrett syndicate gave a 'true and fair view'.
The losses have arisen on 11 run-off reinsurance contracts, designed to assume the liabilities of other Lloyd's syndicates.
The 11 Merrett contracts largely took on liabilities arising from asbestosis and pollution damage risks.
Mr Boswood suggested there was evidence to show that the Lloyd's authorities were concerned about the level of asbestosis liabilities in the early 1980s but did not encourage adequate reserving at the time in order not to cause panic in the market.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments