Lines drawn for fight on fat cat pay
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE FIGHT over the Greenbury Committee's recommendation on pension disclosure is expected to erupt again this week as combatants line up behind two clear choices.
The Institute & Faculty of Actuaries plans to unveil a discussion document in an attempt to defuse the tension between directors of listed companies and institutional fund managers. Altogether it will list five possible options, but only two are felt to be serious contenders.
Despite actuaries' hopes that submissions over the next few months will be close to unanimous, insiders predict a potentially acrimonious split between the two groups.
The decision by the Stock Exchange and the Department of Trade and Industry to throw out the actuaries' original recommendation sparked a bitter dispute in November, with supporters of the actuaries charging that the Greenbury Committee on directors' pay and perks was being nobbled.
Full disclosure of pension benefits was a vital point in Greenbury's proposals: large pay rises in the last months of a boss's career can lead to dramatically increased pension entitlements for years to come.
Information obtained by the Independent on Sunday indicates that the actuaries will put forward five different methods of calculating the cost of executive pension benefits. The two front runners are:
q The transfer value, originally proposed by the actuaries and supported by many institutions, which would calculate the cost of the director's increased pension, assuming he left the job at the end of that year. Listed companies oppose it because the dramatic increases, several times larger than the underlying pay hikes, would leave them open to damaging headlines.
q The smoothed value, favoured by companies, which would show the average value of a director's pension increase assuming he stayed with the company until retirement. But, because it includes estimates about the director's future pay increases, it can be wildly inaccurate.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments