Leschly pay row takes new twist
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE CONTROVERSY over the nine-year pounds 90m pay package amassed by Jan Leschly, chief executive of SmithKline Beecham, took another twist when it emerged that his pounds 5.7m "golden parachute" had not been cut in line with the drug group's other directors.
According to SKB's annual report, Mr Leschly is set to receive a windfall of three years' salary and bonus if he loses his job as a result of a takeover.
Mr Leschly's payoff, worth pounds 5.7m on last year's pounds 1.9m remuneration, is more generous than the packages offered to any other SKB director.
This week SKB said it had decided to cut directors' notice periods from three to two years to meet recommendations of the Greenbury committee on executive pay. But the cut does not apply to Mr Leschly, who is on three years' notice despite having a two-year contract.
An SKB spokesman said Mr Leschly, due to retire in September 2000, had been given a three-year payoff to compensate for his shorter contract. He added that before this year's changes the Danish-born chief executive was the only director on a two-year contract.
The spokesman said he could not comment on why Mr Leschly's potential windfall had not been cut in line with those of his colleagues.
The details of Mr Leschly's takeover compensation are particularly sensitive as SKB is expected to play a major part in the pharmaceutical industry consolidation.
In the recent past the company has been involved in failed talks over two high-profile mergers, with its UK rival Glaxo and with the US group American Home Products.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments