Lawyers consider action against Griffin's US parent
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.LAWYERS representing some of the 110 self-employed Liffe futures traders put out of business by the fall of Griffin, the Chicago-based futures broker, are considering taking action against Roger and Tex Griffin, the American multi-millionaires behind Griffin Trading.
The threat of action in the US emerged as the lawyers began talks with the Securities and Futures Authority (SFA) in an effort to win compensation for the traders.
David Greene of Edwin Coe, which is representing a number of locals - as the traders are known - said that as the UK arm of Griffin was only a branch of the Chicago operation, the American company might be legally liable to compensate the Liffe traders.
Yesterday traders in London warned that the pounds 6m losses made by John Ho Park that led to Griffin's closure before Christmas could result in an ugly legal battle. The three solicitors' firms retained by the traders are threatening legal action against the SFA or the US parent company as a last resort.
None of the locals can start to trade again until they get back some of their funds that were frozen when Griffin collapsed. Stephen Woolfe of City law firm Taylor Joynson Garrett, who is advising four locals, said: "We are looking at the options for recovering [the locals'] assets from Griffin as quickly as possible - either through the regulators or through Griffin itself."
Mr Woolfe said one key question was whether the locals' funds should have been pooled by MeesPierson, the Dutch bank that cleared for Mr Park on the Eurex exchange, or whether they should have been kept in separate "designated" accounts for each trader.
Another avenue could be to allege a "breach of trust" by the Dutch bank on the grounds that locals' funds were being held in trust, said Mr Woolfe.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments