Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Labour turns up heat over pension 'losers'

Paul Durman
Friday 25 March 1994 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Labour is keeping up the pressure on the life insurance industry by using its parliamentary time next Wednesday to debate personal pensions, writes Paul Durman.

Alistair Darling, Labour's City spokesman, is concerned at the many low-earners - up to 2.4 million according to the accountants Coopers & Lybrand - who may lose out after being persuaded to 'contract out' of the State earnings- related pension scheme and into a personal pension.

Mr Darling said: 'In the late 1980s, the Government actively persuaded people that private pensions were usually better than occupational pensions or Serps. For many people that may be true, but for many more it may be not. The Government stands indicted because it did nothing to put in place an effective regulatory system.'

Lautro, the life insurance regulator, is dismissive of the higher estimates of those who have suffered by contracting out of Serps. It said existing estimates were based on flawed data. Much criticism ignored the planned diminution of the value of Serps.

Pat Wynne, a partner with Coopers & Lybrand, said most problems would stem from April 1993, when the Government substantially reduced the rebate and incentive payments it makes to personal pensions for those leaving Serps.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in