KPMG reports 17 per cent rise in revenues ahead of merger with Ernst & Young
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.KPMG, the UK accounting and consulting firm planning to merge with fellow Big Six practice Ernst & Young, will report today that it has produced its best fee performance of the decade, with gross revenues up 17 per cent at pounds 726m.
Mike Rake, chief operating officer at KPMG, pointed to the fact distributable profit had risen 25 per cent to pounds 145m and said the figures showed the merger was being developed from a position of strength. Ernst & Young recently produced figures revealing fees up 15 per cent at pounds 525m.
Moreover, KPMG's profit per partner of pounds 256,000 was broadly in line with the pounds 259,000 reported by E&Y last month, though Mr Rake acknowledged that the spread of earnings was greater at KPMG, with Colin Sharman, KPMG's senior partner, earning considerably more than Nick Land, his counterpart at E&Y. This was being dealt with as the merger proposal was developed, he added.
Today's figures from KPMG come in what it says is the first preliminary announcement by a leading accountancy firm. Mr Sharman described it as "a further indication of our openness and desire to demonstrate complete financial transparency". Full audited accounts for the year ending 30 September 1997 - showing the pay of Mr Sharman and his senior colleagues - will be included in the firm's annual report to be published early in the new year.
Much of the improvement was down to a 36 per cent rise in revenue, to pounds 153m, from management consulting. This amounted to a turnaround, since last year this part of the business had reported a decline in fees while it invested in changing its focus.
However, tax had another strong year, with fees 17 per cent ahead at pounds 152m, while transaction services, such as due diligence work connected with the buoyant activity in mergers and acquisitions, also grew strongly.
Finally, said Mr Rake, while investment, especially in consulting had paid off, overheads had been kept under tight control, particularly in London and the South-east.
Though he was worried about the potential impact of the turbulence in the Far East combining with difficulties in other parts of the world, he said that growth has held up since the end of the year.
Mr Sharman repeated one of the justifications for the planned merger by saying that the firm might have reported even stronger growth had it not been for "the constraint on human resources". He said: "Our clients have placed great demands on new and existing services and the level of fee and profit growth has been justly rewarding. It is interesting to note that both ourselves and Ernst & Young have produced very strong growth and this gives me confidence that our merged firm will grow at an even greater pace."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments