Judge brands Lazard firms incompetent
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.TWO subsidiaries of Lazard Bank were involved in civil fraud and displayed 'staggering incompetence', a court in Jersey found yesterday.
Lazard Bank Jersey and Lazard Trust Company Jersey had been sued for alleged fraud, forgery and breach of trust by a Gloucester- based inventor, Brian West.
Mr West, 60, was claiming pounds 4m from the bank and trust company, which acted as his advisers in a series of property transactions at Stroud, Gloucester, in 1985.
He claimed that the bank and its then managing director, the late David Bulstrode, had lied, forged and destroyed documents. He also claimed that without his consent Mr Bulstrode had sold Stone House Farm, Stroud, which belonged to Mr West's trust, to Jeffrey Pike, a property developer and fellow Lazard bank customer and a friend of Mr Bulstrode, for pounds 1.
In one of the longest civil hearings on the island, in which Lazard's costs are estimated at more than pounds 1m to date, the judge found in favour of Mr West. The judge, Commissioner Francis Hamon, said that there was evidence that Lazard was in breach of Jersey's trust laws and that its handling of the affairs of a trust company set up for Mr West amounted to 'staggering incompetence'.
He said that a number of 'get out' clauses, which Lazard had inserted in trust documents, were contrary to the island's law and 'morally repugnant' and ordered that they be waived.
He heard how five copies of vital trust deed documents had disappeared, and asked how a bank or a trust company could allow the assets of its clients to be transferred without the knowledge of the client.
While there was no evidence of any criminal fraud under Jersey law, he said: 'We have no doubt that civil fraud did take place.'
He awarded damages to Mr West estimated at about pounds 500,000. A decision on costs has been reserved until 9 December.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments