IoD in call for tax review
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Business and government would save millions if the system of collecting tax from companies was simplified, according to a report to be published tomorrow.
The report from the Institute of Directors calls for a review of the way tax legislation is structured. It claims to have found 100 ways to make the system simpler.
The report highlights the need for the administration of PAYE and National Insurance contributions to be amalgamated - or at least co-ordinated - so that employers can avoid having to report information about their employees to both the Inland Revenue and the Department of Social Security.
"No one has provided an adequate explanation as to why we have two different tax systems running in parallel. It is driving our members mad," said Richard Baron, a tax specialist at the IoD and author of the report. He added that a recent survey of member companies had shown a large majority in favour of reforming the collection system.
The IoD report will also take the Government to task for hurrying tax legislation through parliament, particularly the current Finance Bill, which is now at the Commons' committee stage and is scheduled to come into force on 5 August - just 28 days after the legislation was first published.
"MPs do not have time to examine the issues and get outside advice, and they end up getting steamrollered into quick decisions about things they might not fully understand," said Mr Baron.
This theme was taken up separately in a report last week from the tax division of the Institute of Chartered Accountants, which expressed concern at the "very limited time that was allowed to consider the details of the [Finance] Bill."
Peter Hobbs, head of tax at the ICA, said that previous significant changes to corporation tax law had been preceded by extensive consultation but that very little thought had been given in this instance to the abolition of advance corporation tax credits for pension funds, the abolition of foreign income dividends (Fids), and the introduction of the windfall tax.
"Here we have wholesale changes to the corporation tax regime and only three days to make comments between the Bill's publication and its committee stage," said Mr Hobbs.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments