Insults fly over Budget report
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.MEMBERS of the influential House of Commons Treasury Select Committee publicly traded insults yesterday as they launched a controversial report on the Budget that demanded the sacking of the Chancellor of the Exchequer, Norman Lamont.
The report accused the Chancellor of misleading the country about the state of the Government's finances in the run-up to the election and making 'promises about the future which he knew could not be carried out'.
Conservative members of the committee had wanted the criticisms of the Chancellor removed, but were absent when the crucial paragraphs were voted on last week. They accused the Labour members of an 'ambush'.
Quentin Davies MP (Con, Stamford and Spalding), said the Chancellor was suffering 'the most misconceived abuse any minister has had to face'. He accused the Labour members of 'very low-grade political sloganising', and described their tactics as 'puerile and offensive'.
Brian Sedgemore (Lab, Hackney South and Shoreditch) in turn accused the Tories of whingeing and sour grapes. 'The Chancellor has cooked the books, broken election promises and should be dismissed because nobody trusts him,' he said.
The report said the Chancellor's efforts to massage official forecasts for electoral reasons deepened lack of confidence in him among the public and the financial markets. 'In our view the only solution may be for the Prime Minister to act on the almost unanimous advice which has come from the City and replace the Chancellor by someone who can inspire more trust.'
The committee members agreed that further tax increases or public spending cuts might be needed if the Government was to balance its budget by the time the economy had fully recovered. It urged that the minutes of monthly meetings between the Chancellor and the Governor of the Bank of England be published and that the Treasury be more open in its explanations of interest rate changes.
The committee urged the Chancellor to state explicitly that he was aiming to scrap mortgage interest tax relief. It also warned that Britain's deep balance of payments deficit remained a cause for concern despite the fall in the pound since Black Wednesday.
The committee warned that the downgrading of the narrow money supply target to a 'monitoring range' damaged the credibility of policy, and urged that the ranges for broad and narrow money be gradually lowered in later years of the medium-term financial strategy. It concluded that the short-run prospects for inflation were encouraging but that unemployment might not peak for a long time.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments