Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Insolvency fees fall under bank's quote rule

John Willcock
Saturday 29 May 1993 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

SUBSTANTIAL cuts in the costs of winding up bust companies are being achieved by Royal Bank of Scotland in a campaign against excessive fees among insolvency practitioners.

Derek Sach, director of specialised lending services at RBS, said 'significant' progress had been made in driving down fees since the bank started requiring practitioners to quote fixed fees before appointing them.

The bank has also abolished the link between investigating accountants and those subsequently appointed as receivers. Mr Sach felt 'instinctively' that this had reduced the number of receiverships among RBS clients.

Cases such as BCCI, where the liquidators Touche Ross charged fees of dollars 133m between the bank's collapse in July 1991 and this January, have prompted creditors to demand lower costs. So far, only RBS has gone public in demanding quotes for receiverships.

RBS also thinks it has found a way of cutting the number of companies that go bust. Currently, banks send in investigating accountants to problem companies, and if the accountant recommends receivership, he is appointed receiver as a matter of course.

This industry-wide practice is vigorously defended by insolvency accountants for its convenience, but many businessmen have complained that investigating accountants have been foisted on them by their banks, only for the accountants to recommend receivership and collect the lucrative insolvency fees involved. Mr Sach said many clients 'firmly believed that they had been stitched up from day one'.

RBS now requires investigating accountants who recommend receivership to hand the winding up to another firm, putting pressure on them to find a rescue plan rather than pull the plug.

The RBS initiatives have drawn a wary response from insolvency accountants. Tim Hayward, head of corporate reconstruction at KPMG Peat Marwick, said 'most banks would feel the cheapest way is not always the best way to get back the most money for creditors'.

Chris Hughes, London senior insolvency partner at Coopers & Lybrand, said that asking for quotes 'was not helpful - but there may be some circumstances where it would be appropriate, such as when there is a single asset to be sold, like a property'.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in