Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Industry policy paper due in May: Low productivity triggers government move

Michael Harrison,Industrial Editor
Friday 21 January 1994 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE GOVERNMENT is to set out its policy towards industry in a White Paper on competitiveness likely to appear in May.

The decision to produce the paper follows a damning internal report to ministers showing that in terms of manufacturing productivity Britain is 25 per cent behind France, 35 per cent behind Japan and Germany and 60 per cent behind the United States. The paper, which will cut across government departments other than just the Department of Trade and Industry, has the specific endorsement of the Prime Minister.

Michael Heseltine, President of the Board of Trade, disclosed the intention to publish the paper last night while giving evidence to the Commons Trade and Industry Select Committee. The paper will take the form of the DTI's response to the MPs' report, expected in March.

A DTI spokesman said the paper was unlikely to contain legislative proposals but would set out the direction of policy on industry. Among the areas likely to be covered are education and training, research and development, infrastructure, financing of industry and legislative burdens.

Mr Heseltine described manufacturing industry as a 'critical part' of the economy that would receive a proper share of the Government's attention, but added: 'If you mean providing subsidies or engaging in protectionist techniques I am sceptical. If you are looking for government money frankly that is a fiction.'

He pledged that the DTI would give special attention to the aerospace industry, which has called for an extra pounds 1bn to be spent over the next 10 years on technology acquisition. But he ruled out direct support.

The best way the Government could help was by reducing the burden of unnecessary regulation, providing support in export markets and encouraging firms to measure their performance against the world's best standards, he said.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in