How to make a snap decision
Julie Aschkenasy tucks a range of single-use cameras into her handbag and waits to see what develops
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The single-use camera is enjoying a boom: sales have soared by more than35 per cent over the past three years, while those of regular film have slumped. Why? Disposables are easy to use and cheap, rapidly becoming indispensable for the handbag, glove compartment or pocket.
"They are often impulse buys, but those who try them are pleased by the results and buy them again," says Jeremy French, product manager for film and single-use cameras at Boots. "The quality compares favourably with the Boots brand compact camera, which retails at pounds 14.99 - you won't see much difference between the end-results." Steve Waldron of Fuji goes a step further: "Sometimes it is a struggle to see the difference between the results of a single-use and a pounds 40 to pounds 50 camera.
"You can give them to children to use without worrying about your best camera getting ruined. Brides and grooms buy one for each guest and collect them at the end of the night. That way they get the other side of the event: the candid side. Or you can put a film into the glove box so you can take a quick picture if you have a crash.''
Now single-use cameras are becoming smaller and cheaper: the Micro Marvel camera (pounds 1.95), is scarcely bigger than the 110 film it carries. It even doubles as a key ring. The picture quality isn't great, but what do you expect for the price of a pint of beer?
Single-use cameras are little more than films in boxes, so the results depend entirely on the quality of the film and not on sophisticated equipment.
They fall into four categories: basic (no flash), flash, panoramic and underwater. We tested the first three groups. Overall, we liked the Fuji cameras best. Though the dark backgrounds took a while to adjust to, the detail was as sharp as photos produced by regular cameras.
BASIC
Fujicolor Quicksnap Plus, pounds 5.49 for 27 exposures
Rating: 9/10
Comments: easily the best; good sharp detail, especially in close-up
Kodak Fun Daylight Camera, pounds 5.49 for 27 exposures
Rating: 8/10
Comments: good all-rounder
Konica Film-In, pounds 5.49 for 27 exposures
Rating: 7/10
Comments: all pictures came out well, but less detail in the sun
Boots the Snapper, pounds 5.49 (for kids) for 27 exposures
Rating: 6/10
Comments: kids' camera gave sharper results than the adult version (see below)
Boots Single-Use Camera, pounds 4.99 for 27 exposures
Rating: 5/10
Comment: pictures rather underexposed, producing slight sepia tint
FLASH
Kodak Fun Camera with Flash, pounds 8.99 for 27 exposures
Rating: 9/10
Comment: faultless: sharp, bright and consistent pictures
Fujicolor Quicksnap Flash, pounds 8.99 for 27 exposures
Rating: 8/10
Comments: liked the big, clear viewfinder; slight blue tint but pictures were extremely sharp; best for close-ups.
Boots Single-Use Camera with Flash, pounds 7.99 for 27 exposures
Rating: 7/10
Comment: good, strong flash; pictures reasonably sharp
Konica Film-In with Flash, pounds 8.99 for 27 exposures
Rating: 7/10
Comments: good, realistic colour and the flash light comes on nice and quickly; would have scored higher but flash intensity varied
Agfa Le Box Mini Flash, pounds 8.99 for 27 exposures
Rating: 7/10
Comments: colours a little thin - probably not bold enough for the average amateur
Boots the Snapper with Flash, pounds 7.99 for 24 exposures (for kids)
Rating: 6/10
Comments: good images but grainy film
PANORAMIC
Fujicolor Quicksnap Panorama, pounds 7.99 for 15 exposures
Rating: 8/10
Comments: excellent detail
Konica Film-In Panorama, pounds 8.99 for 24 exposures
Rating: 7/10
Comments: more distortion at the edge of the picture than other cameras
Kodak Fun Wide Angle, pounds 7.95 for 15 exposures
Rating: 6/10
Comments: viewfinder rather difficult to use. It has a centring circle which aims to help but simply makes things blurry - like looking through a miniature goldfish bowl. Slight yellow cast
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments